Revenge of the Mouthbreathers Intro/Conclusion Response

The tone is set quick on the intro as its very assertive. The aggressive stance is fueled by politics and a feeling of oppression. Of the bat you sense years of oppression just of the way June describes smokers and the white politics that influence it. June takes a stance that there is a anti working class propaganda and it involves the use of cigarettes. She also touches on race and how nobody cares if Hispanics or African Americans smoke but only if the White Americans smoke. The aggressive tone often creates a strong stream of ideas that expand into other color politics and social issues.

The conclusion was more of the intro but more calm and organized. The conclusion was based off the idea that the working class is displayed in a vulgar manner because they smoke and because they smoke their less of a human than the "professionals." There's also a stance that smoking is a right and liberty that the working class should enjoy without others intruding and speaking about second hand smoking and the physical damages it causes. The argument in the conclusion is rage full as if its insane for someone to ask about second hand smoking or the damages it causes. What right do they have to disturb someone smoking. In all the conclusion was just more anger and oppression but written well and constructed in a organized and poetic manner.