Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Intersex and Erased Again Review/Thoughts

Upon reading this, I was expecting a left winged angry essay just like the ones I've read in the book, but I enjoyed the piece. The writing style and narrative was easy to follow and well written. Often I find with personal and emotional pieces there seems to be a jagged narrative that crosses over into different subjects that don't correlate to the actual topic. In this case, the whole essay stuck to the issue of intersexual people face. In such a sensitive matter I'll tread carefully and try my best to be politically correct. I have not encountered any phycological or physical issues that a person who was born with two reproductive parts so in some parts when reading this essay I found it hard to agree with. Not because I feel I'm against the topic but because I just can't relate. There's one point that left me puzzled when the author says that they were born with both reproductive parts one in the inside and one on the outside they didn't let her choose. While I understand when your in a situation like that the person should decide what gender they prefer to identify with for their lives, but when you are born you can not choose. Since you are a baby, I do feel it should be up to the parents to decide until your older to see what you'd like to identify as. As someone looking through the outside in I sensed a tone of resentment or victimization. One that I found injust especially since no parent would purposely put stress on the child. In regards to the laws and views of the Trump administration I rather not touch on.

2 comments:

  1. I detected that note of resentment too. I think the purpose of the essay was to educate people who may have children in the future rather than to insult her parents. Her point seemed to be WHY did her parents/doctor have to make this choice at all? If intersexuality or nonbinary sexuality was an accepted thing, then she could have grown up not knowing there was anything "wrong" w/ her. At some point, if she identified as female, or male, then she could have chosen the surgery. After all, it's elective surgery. Shouldn't she be the one who elects to do it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. parents make any and all decisions for us until the ripe age of 18. to say the parents shouldnt make the decision i think is a very slippery slope, if so, why let the parents have any decision on their child. DO we then let the state decide? or are no medical decisions made until they're old enough to decide?

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.